| 926
 Yong Rae Kim, the commissioner of KIPO, recently announced the formation of a separate SJP solely devoted to preventing the leakage and infringement of key technologies that are core to national industrial competitiveness.
According to KIPO’s press release, the office has just restructured with the purpose of expanding the former IP Investigation Division and allowing concentrated investigations based on specific areas. A separate Technology & Design Police Division is established to conduct investigations related to technologies and designs while the Trademark Police Division will continue with trademark investigations and the Unfair Competition Investigation Division will handle administrative investigations.
.png "01(1).png") “The copyright s ystem is run by another governmental department called Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, which is beyond KIPO’s reach - that explains why there’s no Copyright Division,” says Yung Joon Kwon, managing partner at Kwon & Kim Patent & Trademark Attorneys in Seoul. “The KIPO special police division was established in September 2010, and they were authorized originally to investigate and enforce for trademark infringement only, which was extended in December 2017 to include unfair competition activities stipulated in unfair competition prevention law, and again extended in March 2019 to cover patents, trade secrets and designs as of now.” .png "02(1).png") “So, they are not ‘brand new’ but rather, have over 10 years of history. Their roles are enhanced not only because there are more infringements but because they expand their organizations to be more capable of enforcing by hiring more policemen,” Kwon says. “As I see it, individual or small business patentees prefer to take advantage of the KIPO police because there is nothing to pay as they are operated with governmental sponsorship, while medium or larger sized right owners prefer to come through law firms to use formal judicial s ystems such as general courts, police or prosecutors since administrative enforcement is sometimes limited in its capacities to enforce law, especially against criminal activities like conducting a raid.” Previously, the IP Investigation Division consisted of 47 personnel who investigated illegal activities related to trademarks, patents, unfair competition, etc. Upon restructuring, an additional 11 officers joined to supplement investigations regarding technology. There are now 22 people in the Technology & Design Police Division, 29 people in the Trademark Police Division, and seven people in the Unfair Competition Investigation Division.  “Those numbers still aren’t sufficient, though! There has been a demand for more people because of a large number of trade secret and design infringement cases being filed at KIPO. While the Divisions have been hiring more people, it has not been enough to meet the demand because of the sharply increasing number of cases,” says Hyeon Gil Ryoo, a partner at Lee & Ko in Seoul. “For example, while the number of trade secret and design infringement cases filed at KIPO increased by 60 percent from 126 cases in 2019 to 199 cases in 2020, the number of Tech Police increased from 18 in 2020 to only 22 people in 2021.” “Because of such personnel shortage, patent, trade secret and design infringement cases at KIPO are taking longer to be processed, with the time taken from case filing to commencement of investigation extended from 90 to 150 days,” says Ryoo.
“With all that said, we believe the SJP will be as effective as the one for trademarks considering that (i) the Tech Police has a high level of technical expertise because KIPO has recruited specialists with both technical and legal expertise gained through years of experience in various IP examinations/trials, and as such, (ii) the Tech Police is capable of conducting independent review (compared to the regular police, which usually requires assistance from experts) and therefore more efficient investigation,” says Joon Young Kwak, a patent attorney at Lee & Ko. “We also note that the Tech Police has actually accumulated substantial experience over the past two years, during which they investigated 425 patent, trade secret and design infringement cases filed at KIPO.” - Johnny Chan Source: http://asiaiplaw.com/section/news-analysis/korean-intellectual-property-office-sets-up-special-judicial-police-for-technology-issues
#이공특허 #이공특허법률사무소 #KWON & KIM Patent & Trademark Attorneys #KWON & KIM #유럽상표 #PCT출원비용 #PCT특허 #국제디자인 #국제디자인출원 #국제상표 #국제상표권 #국제상표등록 #국제상표출원 #국제특허 #국제특허법률사무소 #국제특허출원 #대만상표검색 #대만상표권 #대만상표출원 #마드리드국제상표출원 #마드리드국제출원 #마드리드상표 #마드리드상표등록 #마드리드상표출원 #마드리드출원 #미국디자인등록 #미국디자인특허 #미국상표 #미국상표권 #미국상표권등록 #미국상표권출원 #미국상표등록 #미국상표등록비용 #미국상표출원 #미국상표출원비용 #미국특허 #미국특허비용 #미국특허출원 #베트남상표 #베트남상표검색 #베트남상표권 #베트남상표권등록 #베트남상표등록 #베트남특허 #상표해외출원 #유럽상표권 #유럽특허 #일본상표 #일본상표권 #일본상표권등록 #일본상표등록 #일본상표출원 #일본특허 #중국상표 #중국상표검색 #중국상표권 #중국상표권검색 #중국상표권등록 #중국상표등록 #중국상표등록비용 #중국상표등록조회 #중국상표출원 #중국상표출원비용 #필리핀상표등록 #해외디자인 #해외디자인출원 #해외상표 #해외상표검색 #해외상표권 #해외상표권등록 #해외상표권출원 #해외상표등록 #해외상표출원 #해외출원 #해외특허 #해외특허출원 #헤이그디자인 #대만상표등록 #마드리드상표출원비용 #미국상표권등록비용 #인도상표 #인도특허 #일본상표권조회 #중국디자인출원 #중국상표권출원 #해외디자인등록 #해외상표출원비용 #EU상표 #영국상표 #영국상표등록 #영국상표출원 #유럽상표등록 #유럽상표출원 #유럽연합상표 #중국모방상표 #중국상표거절 #중국상표무효심판 #중국상표이의신청 |
|||
| 목록 |
| 이전글 | 미국 상표법 개정사항 안내 (2021년 12월 27일 시행 예정) |
|---|---|
| 다음글 | 이공특허법률사무소의 권영준 대표변리사, INTA Non-Traditional Marks Committee 위원으로 선정 |
